Dislinked (
dislinked) wrote in
cloudglass2026-01-13 07:14 pm
Entry tags:
INTROS MEME 3
once your character has intro'd on the recent post, comment below with your character's name in the subject line. (Previously intro'd characters can join in on 1/14 so that this crop of intros has the spotlight.) Anyone with a pending app can reply with a direct question, and your character can answer with the TRUTH, say SKIP to skip the question, or FLIP the question back on them. do try for only one SKIP per thread, though there isn't actual meme police.
nothing is considered Canon unless agreed upon by all involved parties.

no subject
Grant and Stewart have as much chemistry with each other as either does with Hepburn, and the film spends much of its runtime luxuriating in the tension among all three. Every scene in which Grant and Stewart verbally spar is alight with the same sexual frisson that screwball comedies usually reserve for male-female pairings. The eventual ending (pairing Stewart off with Ruth Hussey) is simply the most socially acceptable way to collapse a genuinely triadic dynamic back into respectable couples. To me, this is an act of narrative cowardice.
Design for Living had the courage to embrace a bolder resolution seven years earlier -- before the Hays Code made such things unthinkable, of course. By comparison, The Philadelphia Story's conclusion blunts the very energy that makes the film so alive. This timidity -- along with some of the film's dated gender politics -- ultimately hampers it. Hepburn and Grant's other collaborations, like Bringing Up Baby and Holiday, are far more adventurous and satisfying.